This website uses cookies to help us give you the best browsing experience. By continuing to use this portal, you agree to our use of this tool.
To learn more about how we use cookies and how to manage them please read our notice here.
Tip of the Month
Tip of the month - Take care not to miss glaucomatous cupping in patients with small discs!
Take care not to miss glaucomatous cupping in patients with small discs!

Publishing date: July 2020

Tip Editors: Frances Meier-Gibbons, Humma Shahid, Karl Mercieca, Francisco Goni
Tip reviewer: Roger Hitchings


The Science behind the Tip

The diagnosis of glaucoma can be missed in patients with small optic discs (1). In such patients, relative crowding of the retinal nerve cell layer can mean that an optic disc may look relatively normal in an eye with significant glaucoma (2).

Furthermore, such patients may be significantly hyperopic meaning that an visual field defect may be ascribed to optical effects of their hyperopic spectacle correction. Additionally, these patients may be at higher risk of chronic angle closure with intermittent pressure spikes (3). It is important to have a careful look at these patients and not ascribe glaucomatous field loss to other causes (4).

Contributor: James F Kirwan, Portsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, UK




References

1. Nixon GJ, Watanabe RK, Sullivan-Mee M, DeWilde A, Young L, Mitchell GL. Influence of Optic Disc Size on Identifying Glaucomatous Optic Neuropathy. Optom Vis Sci. 2017 Jun;94(6):654-663.
2: Hoffmann EM, Zangwill LM, Crowston JG, Weinreb RN. Optic disk size and glaucoma. Surv Ophthalmol. 2007 Jan-Feb;52(1):32-49. Review.
3: Shen L, Melles RB, Metlapally R, Barcellos L, Schaefer C, Risch N, Herrinton LJ, Wildsoet C, Jorgenson E. The Association of Refractive Error with Glaucoma in a Multiethnic Population. Ophthalmology. 2016 Jan;123(1):92-101.
4: Garway-Heath DF, Ruben ST, Viswanathan A, Hitchings RA. Vertical cup/disc ratio in relation to optic disc size: its value in the assessment of the glaucoma suspect. Br J Ophthalmol. 1998 Oct;82(10):1118-24.



back to top