This website uses cookies to help us give you the best browsing experience. By continuing to use this portal, you agree to our use of this tool.
To learn more about how we use cookies and how to manage them please read our notice here.
Journal Club
Clinical Paper of the Month - Laminar and prelaminar tissue displacement during intraocular pressure elevation in glaucoma patients and healthy controls
Laminar and prelaminar tissue displacement during intraocular pressure elevation in glaucoma patients and healthy controls

Publishing date: February 2011

Author(s): Agoumi Y, Sharpe GP, Hutchison DM, Nicolela MT, Artes PH, Chauhan BC.

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the response of the anterior lamina cribrosa and prelaminar tissue to acute elevation of intraocular pressure (IOP) in glaucoma patients and healthy subjects.

DESIGN: Prospective case-control series.

PARTICIPANTS AND CONTROLS: Patients with open-angle glaucoma (n = 12; mean age±standard deviation [SD], 66.8±6.0 years), age-matched healthy controls (n = 12; mean age±SD, 67.1±6.2 years), and young controls (n = 12; mean age±SD, 36.1±11.7 years).

METHODS: One eye was imaged with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography to obtain 12 high-resolution radial scans centered on the optic disc. Imaging was repeated at precisely the same locations with an ophthalmodynamometer held perpendicular to the globe via the inferior lid to raise the IOP. A line joining Bruch's membrane opening in 4 radial scans was used as reference in the baseline and elevated IOP images. The vertical distance from the reference line to the anterior prelaminar tissue surface and anterior laminar surface was measured at equidistant points along the reference line in the 2 sets of images. The difference between the 2 sets of corresponding measurements were used to determine laminar displacement (LD) and prelaminar tissue displacement (PTD).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Laminar displacement and PTD.

RESULTS: Intraocular pressure elevation among patients, age-matched controls, and young controls was similar (mean±SD, 12.4±3.2 mmHg). The mean±SD LD and PTD were 0.5±3.3 μm and 15.7±15.5 μm, respectively. The LD was not statistically different from 0 (P = 0.366), but PTD was (P<0.001). The mean±SD LD was similar among the groups (-0.5±3.7 μm, 0.2±2.0 μm, and 2.0±3.6 μm, respectively; P = 0.366), whereas the mean±SD PTD was different (6.8±13.7 μm, 20.8±17.5 μm, and 19.6±11.8 μm, respectively; P = 0.045). In all subjects, the PTD was greater than LD. In multivariate regression analyses, LD was negatively associated with optic disc size (P = 0.007), whereas PTD was positively associated with the degree of IOP elevation (P = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS: In glaucoma patients and controls, the anterior laminar surface is noncompliant to acute IOP elevation. Acute optic disc surface changes represent compression of prelaminar tissue and not laminar displacement.

Ophthalmology. 2011 Jan;118(1):52-9. Epub 2010 Jul 24.

Clinical Paper of the Month manager: Andreas Boehm

back to top